In a New Culture, Wait to Cut to the Chase

Another nice example of how culturally biased behavioral preferences can make or break a foreign assignment. My colleague Andy Molinsky (whose book “Global Dexterity” I highly recommend) takes a look at the cultural dimensions “relationship vs task orientation” and “power distance” in a business context which includes a Swiss/German manager in Mexico.
A very good read, as are all of Andy’s articles on the Harvard Business Reviews blog network.

Full story on HBR here:

Xavier Frei wanted to get down to business. A Zurich-born manager with 10 years’ experience working in Germany and Switzerland, Xavier had just landed a few days ago in Monterrey, Mexico, at a small pharmaceutical company that was recently purchased by Xavier’s company, a major European pharmaceutical firm. Xavier’s new role, at least for the next year, was to lead a product development team in Monterrey.

Excited about the new role and anxious to get quick results to impress his own manager, Xavier wanted to hit the ground running. He arranged a meeting of his team and set out responsibilities. He detailed very clearly the tasks people were expected to perform, as well as the dates that certain deliverables were due by. Xavier also explained to the team the urgency that his company felt from European competition and how their work pace would probably be quicker than it had ever been before in that particular company.

Xavier did everything he could to create efficient, optimal working conditions, but for some reason it did not seem to be working. Although no one complained, it didn’t seem like his team respected or trusted him. Xavier noticed how people in the office would be so friendly and convivial with each other, but when they saw him approaching, they would scatter. Xavier had been such an effective engineer in Europe, but there clearly was something different here. How could he turn things around?

A key mistake Xavier made was in taking an overly “businesslike” approach with his Mexican colleagues. In Mexico, relationships matter. It is critical for a boss to show that he knows and cares about his subordinates’ personal lives and families. Business is, of course, also important in Mexico, but the way a boss motivates workers is not completely “businesslike.” A smart manager must integrate the technical and the personal in order to motivate his team.

Global leaders can often struggle when trying to strike the right balance between building relationships and getting down to business. This process is generally easier in one’s native culture, because most people intuitively recognize the relative balance that each of these qualities typically has in the cultural cocktail of an individual country. In Mexico, it’s critical to develop a great deal of time and effort toward getting to know each other and building relationships before focusing on work, whereas in Germany, it’s perfectly acceptable to cut to the chase far sooner to get down to business. But what happens when working across cultures, especially when you are managing a team of people from mixed cultural backgrounds? How do you strike a balance between socializing and executing?

The first tip as a leader is to recognize and read your context. Are you working in a relationship-oriented culture? A task-oriented one? Or a combination of both? As the original example illustrates, national culture clearly plays an important role in this regard. Mexico is an example of a relationship-oriented culture. So too is China, where building deep, personal relationships is a precursor for developing trust and legitimacy. However, one mistake people often make when crossing cultures is to assume that national culture is the only dimension of culture to consider. It’s equally important to recognize the culture of the region you’re operating in, as well as the industry and the company itself. Even in China and Mexico, for example, there are some companies with very different organizational cultures than the country norm. Understanding these nuances is critical as a leader or manager for calibrating your own optimal balance of relationship-building and task-orientation.
[…] continue reading at HBR.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s